In the event of the apocalypse, or social/economical/governmental downfall, or anything else that would render life into a neo-medieval survivalist situation, I like to believe that I would be useful.
It's true, I'm probably no good at fighting. I'm also for sure not a leader. But I refuse to be the little girl that everyone has to defend all the time. The greens are not necessarily a useless lot. Engineers, for example. But if I'm not giving something back to the group, then someday some red is going to have had enough of my freeloading and somehow "accidentally" things will just go bad. In a survivalist group, everyone has to contribute, and if someone thinks you're not contributing, they might do something about it. Or not do something when they should.
So anyway, I am going to be useful. How useful? Depends on the situation. Maybe they need me to make clothes--that depends on if clothing can be scavenged. I know how to make very functional vestments using as little fabric as possible. Of course everyone would look pretty medieval, but that would just be ironically appropriate. It's not my fault that medieval clothing can be extremely multifunctional. I'm just a person who recognizes that fact and knows how to do it. Of course little fashionistas are welcome to contribute, but if their designs waste a lot of fabric and aren't very functional, well, the haute couture may have to crumble for the sake of the greater good.
At the very least, if we scavenge clothing (I imagine we would for the first few years) I can alter and mend it. Furthermore I can make blankets and large "HELLO" signs to put on hillsides. Theoretically I could also make tents, or something. And we're never going to run out of buttons because all that no-longer-useful money of the old world can be very useful in that manner. I guarantee I will find something to do with every last scrap bit of fabric. I can unravel it to use the thread (only useful for hand sewing), or the scrap fabric can become batting for blankets, coats, and padded clothing to be worn with armor.
I'm no good at hacking or any hi-tech specialties like that, but I can use tools pretty well, to build things and stuff. Or I could if I had to. Admittedly I don't have a lot of experience with it, but I feel confident that I could figure out how to build rudimentary necessities.
I can make rope, but the strength really depends on the materials available. At least I understand that there's more to a (useful) rope than tying long pieces of fabric together, and that puts me one up over most people. However, I can weave pretty strong straps using any type of yarn (without needing a loom). Plus, I know how to start fires without matches, and how to make oil lamps, and I can make candles and soaps out of kitchen wastes. (Bacon grease, mostly. Let's hope we catch a few bears, those are nice and greasy and their fur is so warm!) I also know how to build small traps for catching small animals. I can make baskets, too. Don't underestimate the necessity of basketry.
I would probably also end up being a sort of chronicler/historian, thanks to my incessant journalism.
What I like about this post-apocalyptic world is that it's a world in which pop-tab scale mail is actually valid. That's basically the only thing that pop tabs in fashion has going for itself. I actually don't have any idea if that stuff is useful, but it's theoretically better than no armor at all.
And then, just think . . . eventually enough nomadic survivalist groups would join together, and go off into the countryside, and form a little community . . . They could build a giant wall to fend off zombies, mutants, government assassins, or rival survivalist groups. And then instead of scavenging they will actually start to produce things themselves. Growing crops, breeding herds, re-learning the ancient art of surviving the winter. Man, I really wasn't joking when I said neo-medieval. It just seems to be the logical strong of events--though that really depends a lot on how much technology survives and if the survivors can get their hands on it.
So think about it. Would you be useful in a survivalist situation? Do you have anything to contribute to a society in which, if you're not useful, you're out?
As Alyssa and I discussed recently, all those useless girls who have no real skills, well theoretically they could be useful in making babies, but who wants babies with useless genes? Hopefully all the useless people will have died by doing something really stupid in the midst of the apocalypse, like running out into the zombie horde, or running out into a battlefield, or whatever. Unfortunately, surviving an apocalypse has more to do with chance and a bit of luck, than with survival know-how. It's surviving after the apocalypse that your skills are important. We only want smart, useful people in our post-apocalyptic survivalist society.
These past two years I've spent much thought on The Collapse ... if, when, and how.
ReplyDeleteIn a scenario where the food-bearing trucks stopped rolling into Utah from the East, it'd be intriguing to see whether the LDS hierarchy survives — as personally, of course, I don't believe it necessarily must — and whether it could preserve a zone of order on a continent in chaos.
One time I queried John Moore on the collapse-scenario.
ReplyDeleteHe said (approximately) "I'd fucking kill myself, dude."
As for me, the neo-medieval society no doubt will have even less use than the current one for bookish dilettantes, so I don't know that I'd fare much better.
you have got to stop making reference to this whole color scheme thing in your posts. although if you fill me in on where i can learn what they all mean, i will happily grant you permission to continue referencing them.
ReplyDeleteI think it mostly would depend upon what sort of post-apocalyptic world it was. If we're talking about the futuristic apocalypse, then I think I'd be a great asset. I don't think I've ever scored under third place when playing laser tag, and a normal round has around 20 or so people. As long as the weapons we're using to shoot the aliens/mutants/shadow government operatives are recoil-less, I'm quite not bad at all. Assuming that our desperate group is around 5-10 people, there's a good shot that I'd be the best shooter.
ReplyDeleteFurthermore, EE is a lot like technical dabbling. I may not know a lot about a lot of technical things, but quite frankly, our ragtag group of survivors probably doesn't have enough supplies to support a signals expert, a hardware guy and a programmer. Instead you have me who might not do it as well or as fast, but might have a chance of not only getting the cellular tower to turn power on, but actually be able to create a makeshift software to lock the phase, eliminate the noise, et cetera.
Who else but the nerd of the group is going to be able to use the circa 1996 Macintosh laptop to take down the enemies impregnable shields? It certainly isn't Billy, the former collegiate quarter back who almost went pro (though I will admit that the highschool goth who is developing her mysterious psychic powers might be able to as well).
On the other extreme, there is the scenario of survivors versus zombies. Not to brag, but I know I'd be useful here, having lived through this very episode not more than a few months ago. How many members of our squad are going to have actual zombie fighting experience, aside from the other people in the Colorado/Wyoming area?
If, on the other hand, we have a Mad Max/Escape From New York style apocalypse with roving gangs and cult leaders, I don't think I'll do so well. While I can do basic mechanics, I'm not skilled enough to get a totaled car working or, say, armor a bulldozer. The last time I shot a real gun was at scout camp, and I did significantly worse than with a laser pistol.
It goes without saying that I'm not charismatic enough to to lead my own cult.
On a positive note, all my sedentary years have left me with one use for the last scenario. I've developed a bit of a girth which makes me quite useful for....
feeding cannibal hordes and candle making!
This is one of the best posts I've read on anybody's blog in a long time. I was SO glad you invited us to think and comment about what we could contribute, because I had started thinking about that from the beginning. I doubt I would be as useful as you though. If you don't mind, I think I'll steal your idea and post a more thought out blog of my own about my potential contributions.
ReplyDeleteOff the top of my head: I think that my biggest contribution would come in the form of decision making. This must sound very conceited, but I feel like I have the wisdom and judgment to make decisions that will lead to long-term safety and survival. I also have the persuasive skills to convince people that the direction I want the society to go in is the right one. I'm also a decent fisherman, and I definitely know how to survive without the amenities modern campers and boy scouts are accustomed to. I could also help people to know which plants are edible and which aren't, and how to make them taste good. My musical talents would definitely be appreciated on special occasions. Other than that, I think I'd be a dead weight.
Thanks, Derek! Go ahead and write a post. I think you've sufficiently proven your usefulness here. Maybe you won't be the leader leader, but you'll be the leader's first man and ambassador. You've certainly got skills that I wouldn't be able to contribute.
ReplyDeleteWolf: I think you've got the technological skills necessary to be an asset to the group. Like I said, I haven't bothered to detail how much technology is left, if it's available, and how current or futuristic it is. Needless to say, if there's any technology left we'll need someone like you to deal with it. Plus, while I can build rudimentary chairs, tables, and boxes, you can build electric stuff which can be even more useful than the basic necessities (assuming we can scrounge up all the parts).
Liz: I thought I explained this to you already! I'll write you a message on the book of faces.
Logan: I wasn't thinking of religion at all, to be honest. I assumed that so very many people had died that it would be kind of difficult, if not pointless, to try to depend on any type of bureaucracy, because one couldn't be pulled together, at least not at first. I can see that, if enough LDS people survive and eventually find each other, they might try it, and I suppose it must also depend on if there is a mass communication network still available.
Hmmm interesting thoughts.
ReplyDeleteWho are "all those useless girls" to whom you refer?
As for whether I would be "useful" in a survivalist setting, I do not know. I would at least probably not have a net negative impact on the group. I'm not really a complainer; I like and thrive in new situations and ones which require innovation; and I'm a fast learner at pretty much anything I try. And, for some reason, funny things always seem to happen to me, so maybe all these grim people faced with extinction would need a laugh every once in awhile.
So I am hoping that people would keep me around.
I have a list going of people who are invited to my apocalypse (or rather with whom I would like to team up.)
ReplyDeleteI have lots of skills relating to survival and rudimentary knowledge of a lot more stuff that I think I could get figured out pretty quickly should the need arise. for both a post-apocalyptic city setting and wilderness.
the cool thing about SLC is that the mountains are only a couple day's walk away.
I have a huge collection of books on survivalist subjects too. and I can be a leader if I need to be (training from being tricked/forced into leadership positions my whole life, even if against my nature.)
so i'm here for growing food and making textiles, for sure. I don't know if I'd be much help in fighting or hunting.
useless girls=girls with no identifiable brains or skills.... maybe they don't really exist, (and I just don't know the girls that I think are useless well enough to know they aren't really useless) but there sure seems to be a lot of them.